When I saw the title “there is no pound for pound” today, I was a little stunned. What does this mean? I started searching for some relevant information on the Internet.
I saw that many people have different opinions on this term. For example, someone named Mendez thinks that people have misunderstood the point of this discussion. There are also some guys who say that “pound for pound” is a way to compare fighters of different weights to find out who is the best, but others hold the opposite view.
To figure out what was going on, I continued to search and found that some people used their own experience to explain. For example, a guy named Aljamain Sterling thought that Jon Jones should be the No. 1 in “pound for pound”, but another guy named Islam Makhachev disagreed.
So what exactly is “pound for pound”?
- I learned that it’s a ranking method used in combat sports, like boxing, wrestling, or mixed martial arts.
- It’s used to compare fighters of different weights. Because they don’t fight each other directly, judging who is the best requires some subjective opinions, so the rankings are different.
I also found a ranking list:
- Islam Makhachev (26-1, lightweight champion)
This ranking list is meant to determine the best fighter in the sport regardless of weight. It’s related to the number of their wins and the level of their opponents.
After reading this information, I roughly understood the meaning of “there is no pound for pound”. It means that this kind of cross-weight ranking is actually very subjective, and there is no unified standard. Everyone can have their own opinion. This discovery made me feel that this is a very interesting topic, and there’s a lot of room for discussion!
So, I decided to share my whole research process with you guys. What are your thoughts on “pound for pound”? Let’s talk about it!